In this method, a structure is proportioned (designed) to resist code-specified service loads, which are assumed to be loads that a structure might be subjected to during its service life. Masonry structures have been and continue to be designed based on the allowable stress design method (also called service load method or working stress design). The allowable (or working) stresses used in design are a fraction of the accepted failure strengths of materials (viz., compressive strength of masonry and yield strength of steel reinforcement) used in design. The structure is so proportioned that actual (i.e., calculated) stresses do not exceed the allowable stresses.
In the strength design approach, the code-specified service loads (such as dead load, live load, wind load, earth pressure, fluid pressure, etc.) assumed to act on a structure are augmented by multiplying with certain factors called load factors (which are different for different loads, also called factors in some design codes), resulting in what are called factored loads. The basic premise of the strength approach is that it results in more economical structures and provides more realistic consideration of protection. The structure is then so proportioned that its design strength, , is equal to or greater than the needed strength (i.e., effects of factored loads, also sometimes referred to as demand). This simple relationship can be expressed by Eq. below:
where, =strength reduction factor
=resistance offered by framework (or nominal strength)
U=the required strength (i.e., effects of factored loads on the structure)
On the right-hand side of this equation, U represents the needed strength or the effects due to loads, such as bending moment, shear force, axial force, etc., obtained from structural analysis. Equation (1) is a generic equation that represents the relationship between the design strength of a structure and the needed strength (load effects). In specific terms of member strengths, such as moments (M), shear (V), and axial load (P), Eq. (1) can be written as follows:
In Eqs. (2) to (4), subscripts n and u denote, respectively, nominal strength and the factored load effects (or demand). Nominal strengths are calculated from principles of applied mechanics using factored loads, which are based on code-specified service loads. The strength reduction factor associated with different types of nominal strengths (moment, shear, axial load, etc.) is specified for each type of loading condition.
There are many good reasons for applying strength reduction factors to nominal strengths:
1.Actual loads might be different from those assumed in design calculations.
2.Actual load distribution in a framework might be different from that assumed in design.
3.Actual member dimensions might be different than assumed in design calculations.
4.Actual substance strengths might be different from those assumed/specified in design.
5.The assumptions and simplifications assumed in design might result in load effects (moment, shear, axial loads, etc.) different from those actually acting on the framework.
6.Actual structural behavior might be different (usually is) owing to the presence of redundancies (influence of rigidity provided by nonstructural members is ignored in structural analysis).
7.Reinforcement might not be in the same exact position as specified by the designer.
To account for these uncertainties, the nominal strength of a member is reduced by multiplying it with the strength reduction factor ; its value depends on member loads, such as moment, shear, compression, etc.