Overcoming Difficulties in Leveling During Surveying

Introduction

Definition of Leveling

Leveling is a fundamental aspect of surveying that involves measuring the relative heights of various objects situated on or beneath the Earth’s surface. This process is crucial for determining ground undulations, facilitating the creation of accurate topographical maps, and supporting construction and engineering projects. By establishing precise elevation points, leveling ensures that structures are built on stable and level foundations, thereby enhancing their safety and longevity.

Challenges in Leveling

Despite its importance, leveling is often fraught with challenges that can complicate the surveying process. These difficulties arise from diverse ground conditions, natural formations, and structural obstacles that interfere with the smooth execution of leveling tasks. Such impediments not only affect the accuracy of measurements but also increase the time and effort required to complete surveys. Consequently, it is essential for surveyors to employ effective methods to overcome these challenges, ensuring the reliability and efficiency of their work.

Situations Making Leveling Difficult and Their Solutions

1. When the Staff is Close to the Instrument

Problem

In certain scenarios, the leveling staff must be positioned very close to the surveying instrument. When the staff is placed within the instrument’s focusing limit, the telescope can lose its clarity, resulting in blurred readings. This proximity makes it challenging to obtain precise staff measurements, leading to potential inaccuracies in the survey data.

Solution

To address this issue, surveyors can use a white paper as a visual aid. By holding the staff vertically and slowly moving a white paper up and down in front of it, the surveyor can observe the edge of the paper through the telescope. The optimal staff reading is determined by stopping the paper movement when the line of collimation aligns with the edge of the white paper. This method allows for an accurate reading despite the close proximity of the staff to the instrument.

2. Leveling Across a Large Lake

Problem

Performing leveling across large bodies of still water, such as lakes or ponds, poses significant challenges. The vast expanse of water can obscure the leveling line, making it difficult to maintain a consistent and accurate measurement across the water surface.

Solution

Surveyors typically assume that the water surface of a still pond or lake is level, as the water remains stationary. To proceed with leveling, two pegs are fixed at the banks of the pond, ensuring that the tops of the pegs coincide with the water surface. The staff is placed on the first peg, and the reduced level (RL) is measured using a foresight (FS) reading. It is then assumed that the RL of the second peg is identical to the first peg. The leveling instrument is shifted to the opposite bank, and a back sight (BS) reading is taken from the second peg, allowing the surveyor to continue the leveling process seamlessly.

3. Leveling Across a River

Problem

Unlike lakes, rivers present additional challenges for leveling due to the constant flow of water, which means the water levels at the two banks are rarely the same. This variability complicates the process of establishing a consistent leveling line across the river.

Solution

The reciprocal leveling method is employed to overcome this challenge. Surveyors fix pegs on both banks of the river and measure the true difference in levels between these points. By taking reciprocal measurements—where the instrument is alternately positioned on each bank and readings are taken in both directions—the surveyor can accurately determine the RL of the second peg despite the flowing water. This method accounts for the varying water levels, ensuring accurate and reliable leveling across the river.

4. Leveling Across a Solid Wall

Problem

When a solid wall obstructs the leveling line, it becomes difficult to measure the RL of points directly at the wall. The obstruction prevents the surveyor from obtaining clear sightlines necessary for accurate measurements.

Solution

To navigate this obstacle, surveyors drive pegs on both sides of the wall, ensuring that the staff just touches the wall without penetrating it. The height of the surveying instrument is first measured using a known benchmark or a champion point. A staff reading is then taken on one side of the wall, and the height of the wall is measured with the staff. Using these measurements, the RLs of all relevant points can be calculated. This process is repeated on the opposite side of the wall, allowing the surveyor to continue leveling without disruption.

5. Benchmark Lies Above Line of Collimation

Problem

In certain situations, the benchmark may be positioned above the instrument’s line of collimation, such as beneath a bridge girder or the lower surface of a culvert. This placement complicates the reading process, as the benchmark is not directly in the line of sight.

Solution

Surveyors address this issue by first taking a foresight reading from a reference point (Point A) using the instrument positioned at a known location (Point O). The staff is then held in an inverted position beneath the elevated benchmark. A back sight (BS) reading is taken from this inverted staff, and the reading is recorded with a negative sign, accompanied by a remark indicating that the “staff held inverted.” This method allows for accurate measurement of the RL despite the benchmark’s elevated position.

6. Leveling Along a Steep Slope

Problem

Leveling along steep slopes, such as in hilly regions, presents difficulties in obtaining equal back sight and foresight readings. The steep terrain can cause discrepancies in measurements, leading to potential errors in determining RLs.

Solution

To mitigate this issue, surveyors position the leveling instrument in a zigzag pattern along the slope. By carefully selecting instrument positions that maintain equal back sight and foresight readings, the surveyor can ensure consistency in measurements. This zigzag approach accommodates both positive and negative steep slopes, allowing for accurate calculation of RLs at each point despite the challenging terrain.

7. Leveling Across Depression or Rising Ground

Problem

Uneven terrain, such as high-rise (rising) ground or depressions, complicates the placement of the leveling instrument. Incorrect positioning can lead to inaccurate readings and hinder the leveling process.

Solution for Rising Ground:

When dealing with rising ground, the instrument should be positioned so that the line of collimation passes through the apex of the rise. This placement ensures that measurements are taken accurately across the elevated area, maintaining consistency in RL calculations.

Solution for Depressed Ground:

In cases of depressed ground, the instrument should be placed on one side of the depression, with the staff positioned on the opposite side. This arrangement allows the surveyor to obtain accurate readings across the depressed area without interference from the uneven terrain.

Conclusion

Adaptation is Key

Effective surveying requires adaptability in the face of various challenges. By employing specific methods tailored to overcome the difficulties encountered during leveling, surveyors can ensure the continuity and accuracy of their work. Whether dealing with natural obstacles like rivers and lakes or structural impediments such as solid walls, the ability to adapt techniques is essential for successful leveling.

Ensuring Accuracy

Maintaining accuracy is paramount in surveying, as even minor errors can have significant repercussions for construction and engineering projects. By utilizing the outlined methods to address leveling challenges, surveyors can uphold the integrity of their measurements. Proper techniques not only facilitate the completion of surveys under adverse conditions but also ensure that the resulting data is reliable and precise, thereby supporting the successful execution of various projects.